Mother

Written on 14 nov 2011

this makes me puzzled to think
what can i write about this thing

to say the least, she becomes the nurturer
to say the most, nothing can conquer her
she is the essence of the world
the factory of life and dynamism

it puzzles me sometimes
how she can tame someone just by her touch
that how by just a little drop of tear, kingdoms fall
and why can a woman so weaker than a man
guide which way the destiny will take its shape

she is a human, has her own needs
but she forgets them, when children call

why did mother become so important ?
it's not like she is a celebrity
just for bearing a baby,
is this a reason for her greatness ?

Life or freedom

Written on Sept 29

What is more important ? Life of a person or the freedom of that person ?

Is this topic also very much subjective ?

I am afraid this topic is also subjective. This question's answer will vary from person to person.

I thought earlier that everyone would of course fight for his freedom as it is the dearest thing to him. But I ignored 'fear/bondage' that many people hold in their minds, either consciously or subconsciously. Those people are not free and they are content to be like this. They cherish existence as more important value than freedom. A continuous flow of time and space, irrespective of whether the situation is fear inducing or freedom inspiring; this becomes their primary cherished feature of their world.

Who knows who is right among them. They both stand on their own pedestals with no one beside to compare with.

Soul

Written some months back

I do not understand it very much. But whatever idea I get, it seems like pillar of glue to which various features of a living being attach, unconditionally. It's too naive of a definition for soul. But I am unable to come up with a better one. I assumed that soul is a constant unchanging ingredient, inclusion of which in body makes it living and exclusion makes it dead.

I am fascinated by the diversity of the contents attached to the soul. 

Congress, Indian National Congress

It started as a representative body of an all nation collective conscience filled people. The senior most member was it's president for the first time.

For the next 60 odd years, it would shape up the fetus of an Independent India so that it emerged strong enough to stand without any support.

As far as I recollect, during all those years, every year the party president changed. Raja Ram Mohan roy, Sarojini Naidu, Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Motilal Nehru, Jawahar Lal Nehru, Annie Besant and so many others presided separately over annual congress meetings.

After India became independent, why was this trend changed ? Why has only the Gandhi family headed the party since then ? Why is this family being treated like a dynastic family, destined to rule people ? Why are the members of the party keeping their hands open, apparently begging for their roles from the Gandhi family ?

Is it really a democratic party now? 

Prasiddha

An ambition has ended abruptly. I do not like this.

picchar baaki reh gayi. I do not like this.

Life, uff!!

Try to enjoy the journey, Prasiddha, my friend!

(written on 18 Jan 13)